Physics:Quantum data analysis/Fast Fourier Transforms: Difference between revisions
Normalize Quantum book page structure and short text |
Apply continuous Quantum previous-next navigation |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Fast Fourier Transforms in particle-physics data analysis}} | {{Quantum article nav|previous=Physics:Quantum data analysis/Non Linear Regression|previous label=Non Linear Regression|next=Physics:Quantum data analysis/Filtering|next label=Filtering}} | ||
| |||
| |||
| |||
{{Short description|Fast Fourier Transforms in particle-physics data analysis}} | |||
{{Quantum data backlink|Advanced Data Comprehension Techniques}} | {{Quantum data backlink|Advanced Data Comprehension Techniques}} | ||
| Line 11: | Line 15: | ||
<div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;"> | <div style="flex:1; line-height:1.45; color:#006b45; column-count:2; column-gap:32px; column-rule:1px solid #b8d8c8;"> | ||
</div> | '''Fast Fourier Transforms''' is used in particle-physics data analysis to turn detector output, simulated samples, and theoretical models into quantitative physics results. In high-energy experiments the term is connected with event selection, calibration, uncertainty treatment, validation, and comparison with Standard Model or beyond-Standard-Model predictions. The analysis task is usually defined by the observable being measured or the signal being searched for. A robust workflow keeps raw detector information, reconstructed objects, simulated events, control samples, and statistical models traceable so that assumptions can be checked and systematic uncertainties can be propagated. In practice, fast fourier transforms must be documented with selection definitions, units, binning choices, correction factors, and reproducible code or configuration.</div> | ||
<div style="width:300px;"> | <div style="width:300px;"> | ||
| Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
== Practical considerations == | == Practical considerations == | ||
In practice, fast fourier transforms must be documented with selection definitions, units, binning choices, correction factors, and reproducible code or configuration. This makes the result easier to compare across experiments and easier to reinterpret when improved simulations, calibrations, or theoretical predictions become available.<ref name="pdg-data">{{cite journal |collaboration=Particle Data Group |title=Review of Particle Physics |journal=Physical Review D |volume=110 |issue=3 |pages=030001 |year=2024 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001}}</ref> | In practice, fast fourier transforms must be documented with selection definitions, units, binning choices, correction factors, and reproducible code or configuration. This makes the result easier to compare across experiments and easier to reinterpret when improved simulations, calibrations, or theoretical predictions become available.<ref name="pdg-data">{{cite journal |collaboration=Particle Data Group |title=Review of Particle Physics |journal=Physical Review D |volume=110 |issue=3 |pages=030001 |year=2024 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001}}</ref> | ||
== Quality checks == | |||
For fast fourier transforms, useful checks include closure tests on simulated samples, comparison with independent control regions, and stability tests under reasonable changes of selection, calibration, and binning. These checks help separate statistical fluctuations from analysis choices and detector effects. | |||
== Documentation == | |||
The page should record the definition of the objects being used, the data or simulation inputs, and the uncertainty model. That documentation is important because later measurements often reuse the same workflow with improved detector conditions or larger data sets. | |||
=See also= | =See also= | ||
Latest revision as of 22:09, 20 May 2026
Overview
Fast Fourier Transforms is used in particle-physics data analysis to turn detector output, simulated samples, and theoretical models into quantitative physics results. In high-energy experiments the term is connected with event selection, calibration, uncertainty treatment, validation, and comparison with Standard Model or beyond-Standard-Model predictions.
Analysis role
The analysis task is usually defined by the observable being measured or the signal being searched for. A robust workflow keeps raw detector information, reconstructed objects, simulated events, control samples, and statistical models traceable so that assumptions can be checked and systematic uncertainties can be propagated.
Practical considerations
In practice, fast fourier transforms must be documented with selection definitions, units, binning choices, correction factors, and reproducible code or configuration. This makes the result easier to compare across experiments and easier to reinterpret when improved simulations, calibrations, or theoretical predictions become available.[1]
Quality checks
For fast fourier transforms, useful checks include closure tests on simulated samples, comparison with independent control regions, and stability tests under reasonable changes of selection, calibration, and binning. These checks help separate statistical fluctuations from analysis choices and detector effects.
Documentation
The page should record the definition of the objects being used, the data or simulation inputs, and the uncertainty model. That documentation is important because later measurements often reuse the same workflow with improved detector conditions or larger data sets.
See also
Table of contents (60 articles)
Index
Full contents
References
- ↑ "Review of Particle Physics". Physical Review D 110 (3): 030001. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001.
Source attribution: Physics:Quantum data analysis/Fast Fourier Transforms